(Svelte) Subscribing to State Like useEffect in React

A common question among developers transitioning from React to Svelte is, “How can I subscribe to state changes in Svelte, similar to React’s useEffect?”

To answer this, we need to make good use of Svelte’s unique reactive syntax.

Simple State Subscription

In React, the useEffect hook detects changes in the component’s state and executes side effects when a specific state changes.

useEffect(() => {
  console.log(name);
}, [name]);
js

In Svelte, similar functionality can be achieved using reactive statements. Defined with the $: symbol, Svelte’s compiler automatically re-executes the statement whenever any variable used in the expression changes.

<script>
  $: console.log(name);

  // Multi-line format
  $: {
    console.log(name);
  }

  // Immediately Invoked Function Expression (IIFE) format
  $: (() => {
    console.log(name);
  })();
</script>
svelte

Subscribing to Specific States

React allows executing side effects dependent on specific states using the dependency array.

useEffect(() => {
  console.log(state1, state2, state3);
  // Executed only when state1 changes.
}, [state1]);
js

However, in Svelte, a reactive declaration with $: reacts to changes in all related states. If state1, state2, or state3 changes, the side effect gets executed.

<script>
  $: console.log(state1, state2, state3);
  // 🚨 Executed whenever state1, state2, or state3 changes.
</script>
svelte

To address this, you can extract unnecessary dependencies outside the $: expression. That is, declare the side effect function separately and pass only the state you want to depend on.

<script>
  const effect = (state1) => {
    console.log(state1, state2, state3);
  };
  $: effect(state1);
</script>
svelte

For a more React-like approach, you can write it as follows:

<script>
  const effect = () => {
    console.log(state1, state2, state3);
  };
  $: effect(), [state1];

  // $: (() => {
  //   effect();
  // })(), [state1];
</script>
svelte

This may seem a bit complex, but it makes the code more concise, especially with TypeScript.

Reactive and Rendering

Unlike React, rendering and state subscription in Svelte are separate processes. Keep in mind that accessing the DOM after rendering requires using tick.

<script>
  import { tick } from 'svelte';

  let btnEl;
  let cnt = 1;

  const checkBtnWidth = async () => {
    if (!btnEl) return;

    // Promise that ensures state updates are applied to the DOM
    await tick();

    const { width } = btnEl.getBoundingClientRect();
    console.log(width);
  };
  $: checkBtnWidth(), [cnt];

  const onClick = () => {
    cnt = cnt * 10;
  };
</script>

<button bind:this={btnEl} on:click={onClick}>
  {cnt}
</button>
svelte

Test it yourself on REPL!

In Conclusion

Svelte is often said to have a lower barrier to entry compared to other frameworks. It certainly allows for writing succinct code with ease, but like React, a deep understanding of the framework is essential to handle complex web applications.

With the recent preview of Svelte 5, a new reactive system named runes was introduced. Although the code structure appears somewhat peculiar, it seems to offer a more intuitive way of managing dependencies. This might raise the entry barrier for beginners in frontend development, but it could make it easier for developers from the React community to transition to Svelte.